Can freedom of speech guaranteed by 1st Amendment be lawfully and Essay

Can independence of speech guaranteed by 1st Amendment be lawfully and soundly used to advocate abolishment of 1st Amendment - Essay ExampleEven advocating smuggled acts is legal. Therefore, if we can use our freedom of speech to, for example, control someone with our lies, or to impose our personal convictions to others, thither is no reason why we could not use that same freedom to advocate its own abolishment. every(prenominal) single individual has the rightfield to express their opinion. Although, sometimes not entirely. In some cases an individual whitethorn not be allowed to fully express his right of free speech because it may lead to woeful actions or have a bad effect on the society. This way of prevention is called censorship and it is a crucial symptom of collectivism. Furthermore, if everything gets under the control of the government (gets nationalized), it will mark the end of free speech.No matter how offensive its content is, freedom of speech is protected by the offset Amendment and it is believed that academic freedom is a bedrock of education in a free society, furthermore, it cannot be denied, unless the speaker breaks the rules of the first Amendment that forbid the use of fighting words (which atomic number 18 not essential part of exposition of ideas and are likely to provoke a person to take revenge).Everyone has a right to express themselves freely, as longsighted as they respect the few of restrictions of the first Amendment. Using that right, we can lawfully speak about nearly anything. And, yes, we can use that right to speak against the first Amendment without doing anything that is illegal. But the fact that we have the legal right to speak against the first Amendment does not mean that anyone has to hear about it. Free speech does not contract anyone to listen. But who would want to limit or completely abolish his rights?Theoretically, freedom of speech can be lawfully used to advocate abolishment of the first Amendment, but there are not umteen people who would agree that it would be a good thing to abolish it, and, without the support of the listeners, the one who advocates the