Corporate Responsibility for Childhood Obesity Essay

Corporate Responsibility for Childhood Obesity - Essay ExampleThe exchange argument in Linns case is that the food manufacturing companies are the ones responsible for the high number of obese kids in society. However, David has a different argument stating that it is the accountability of the guardian and the kid to ensure that the child does not get obese. These central arguments are different and reviewing their supporting arguments offers more insight on the curve.The key difference between these dickens authors is on who ought to take debt instrument for the obesity problem facing kids in the contemporary world. fit in to Susan Linn, the responsibility for this goes to the companies that manufacture these foodstuffs. She supports this by further stating that the advent in technology has made companies powerful enough to fake the authority of the parent when a kid wants to purchase a particular commodity. They have done this by producing commodities that are cheap enough fo r a kid to purchase with their allowance without necessarily asking their parents for the money.According to David, the responsibility for this falls on the companies and parents. David offers an example of his life where he received enough money to go to fast food restaurants and take his daily meals. He states that this has not changed with the contemporary families and is thus the parents responsibility. He further states that the kids ought to practice self-control not to go into these restaurants and eat fast foods. David comments on the issue of children that have flocked courts claiming to sew these fast food restaurants for their obese conditions (ZincZenko). He states that this is a wrong thing to do and that instead of suing these companies, the kids ought to take great care of their health. The fast food companies are also at rupture because they do not indicate the ingredient content on their commodities and this leads to misinformed decisions among