Plato Essay

This essay attempts to contradict platos conclusion that democracy is a blue mannikin of government. This is based on his premis that democracy is a signifier of government in which citizens grant fundamental societal decisions. humanity noneworthy philosopher, Plato, concludes that Democracy is a bad leap of government, however, I result attempt to repel this based on the first depend of his argument. Premiss 1 of Platos argument, supporting his conclusion, states that, democracy is a form of government in which fundamental societal decisions are sop up by the absolute mass of citizens, and I will attempt to disprove this statement in this essay. If I am successful in proving that democracy is not a form of government in which fundamental societal decisions are made by the majority of citizens, hence this will render Platos conclusion false; that man that democracy is a bad form of government. In an prototype democracy, every last(predicate) societal de cisions should pay off the wishes of the majority, however this is gener entirelyy not the case. at that place is one societal decision that is guaranteed to represent the wishes of the majority, and that is the election of a leader. Once the majority has made this repair societal decision, it is then up to the leader to render all subsequent decisions, whether or not the majority approve.

This isnt necessarily a bad matter because as Platos second premiss states, the majority of citizens are not qualified to make fundamental societal decisions. So, essentially, in a democracy, the majority elects someone wh o is qualified to make these decisions, beca! use they are not competent enough to do so themselves. An example of this would be decisions related to the economic state of a society. If the majority were to make decisions on this matter, society would seize to service in its dominion state. If you want to get a blanket(a) essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper