Condemn the Crime, Not the Person by June Tangney

In chafe the Crime, Not the Person by June Tangney is a paper that asserts that the virtually fitting sentencing for a culpable, so they wad contemplate on it. Most people that send off crimes, have gotten public vexation that is shaming sentences. Shaming sentences is intentional to give the criminal sanction explicitly designed to induce feelings of shame. This means receiving confusion from their neighbors, friends, and family members. It makes them feel ashamed, but it does non give them the fortune to contrive on the mistakes that they have committed. The seek indicates that a public humiliation is not helping the psyche to alter their criminal behavior. universe humiliation only do them feel powerless and worthless. In addition, a person moldiness feel shame, and they tend to fancy hiding places or point out defensive tactics to withstand them. In the other hand, the person that did the crime and they need to do society services, most of them can reflect o n what they did was wrong. I restrain on what June Tangney had illustrated and overlap in her writing, in regards to familiarity services being a sufficient solution to correct their criminal behavior. It allows them to reflect on what they did, and they might not ever commit crimes again.\nFirst, I agree with June Tangney because I believe that lodge service helps people reflect on what have they did and did a reparative action. Community service is the typecast of unpaid work, intended to be of social use that the wrongdoer is required to do found on the article that Tangney wrote. As like June wrote, research has shown that this find of tension and regret typically motivates reparative action. That piece of sentences has a sozzled meaning, and it delivers Junes opinion about(predicate) the companionship service sentences. The community service program allows inmates an opportunity to give back to the community while at the same(p) time supporting the sections restor ative evaluator initia...